it has been a crazy week, and only wednesday. so much going on in the world. revolution. huge freelance project. housequake.*
(not to equate the three, of course. what's going on revolution-wise is remarkable and humbling. odd to twitter about my 1000th follower this week when people are using it for life and death...)
thus, briefly, are a few tidbits from the mail:
of note in the northeast: the philadelphia wedding project is 6 photographers banding together for a giveaway for one lucky couple getting married in 2010 or 2011. check out the extensive rules (oddly no NY, FL, or RI residents allowed...) and then tell your story by August 31, 2009.
for NYC folks interested in the local farm-to-table and eco-catering scene, great performances and edible manhattan are having fundraising events celebrating the 100-mile menu starting july 15, proceeds benefit the sylvia center.
for all you west coasters, there's the san francisco dream wedding giveaway -- ok, ok, so the contest doesn't *start* until august 4, but you can take a sneak preview and get details. wedding date is may 14, 2010.
plus i just discovered all these emails from the week i was on vacation, and i missed some great opportunities. what wedding blogger vacates in june? an accidental one, friends. will try to respond, if you're still hanging out there...
*more on housequake in a future post!
Wednesday, June 24, 2009
1 comment:
hello readers -- thank you so much for your thoughts! I do my best to respond, please know I appreciate and read them all.
with that said: PLEASE DO NOT LEAVE SPAM COMMENTS. It takes your time to write and my time to delete, and I will delete every one of them.
書かないで下さい SPAM。 私はそれを削除します。 ありがとう。
(comments made more than 2 weeks after posting are moderated to cut down on spam -- thanks for your patience!)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
LinkWithin
Thanks for mentioning the Philadelphia Wedding Project! Yes, it broke our hearts to exclude residents of (NY, FL, RI) but unfortunately their laws for giveaways are very extensive (frankly cost-prohibitive) and found it easier this way.
ReplyDelete